इस लेख को अंग्रेजी से हिन्दी में अनूदित करने की आवश्यकता है।
यह लेख अंग्रेजी में लिखा है। यदि यह लेख अंग्रेजी भाषा के समुदाय के लिए बनाया गया है, इसका योगदान अंग्रेजी विकिपीडिया में किया जाना चाहिए। विकिपीडियाओं की सूची देखें।
To avoid the confusion caused by the ambiguity of sin−1(x), the reciprocals and inverses of trigonometric functions are often displayed as in this table. In representing the cosecant function, the longer form 'cosec' is sometimes used in place of 'csc'.
Different angular measures can be appropriate in different situations. This table shows some of the more common systems.
Radians is the default angular measure and is the one you use if you use the exponential definitions. All angular measures are unitless.
From the two identities above, the following table can be extrapolated. Note however that these conversion equations may not provide the correct sign (+ or −). For example, if sin θ = 1/2, the conversion in the table indicates that , though it is possible that . More information would be needed about which quadrant θ lies in to determine a single, exact answer.
Rarely used today, the versine, coversine, haversine, and exsecant have been defined as below and used in navigation, for example the haversine formula was used to calculate the distance between two points on a sphere.
नाम
मान
सममिति, अनतर एवं आवर्तन (Symmetry, shifts, and periodicity)
जब त्रिकोणमितीय फलन के कुछ मानों से परिलक्षित होते हैं, तो परिणाम अक्सर अन्य त्रिकोणमितीय फलनों में से एक होता है। इससे निम्नलिखित सर्वसमिकाए प्राप्त होती है:
By shifting the function round by certain angles, it is often possible to find different trigonometric functions that express the result more simply. Some examples of this are given shown by shifting functions round by π/2, π and 2π radians. Because the periods of these functions are either π or 2π, there are cases where the new function is exactly the same as the old function without the shift.
Shift by π/2
Shift by π Period for tan and cot
Shift by 2π Period for sin, cos, csc and sec
कोणों के योग और अन्तर की सर्वसमिकाएँ (Angle sum and difference identities)
(Sines and cosines of sums of infinitely many terms)
where "|A| = k" means the index A runs through the set of all subsets of size k of the set { 1, 2, 3, ... }.
In these two identities an asymmetry appears that is not seen in the case of sums of finitely many terms: in each product, there are only finitely many sine factors and cofinitely many cosine factors.
If only finitely many of the terms θi are nonzero, then only finitely many of the terms on the right side will be nonzero because sine factors will vanish, and in each term, all but finitely many of the cosine factors will be unity.
If x, y, and z are the three angles of any triangle, or in other words
(If any of x, y, z is a right angle, one should take both sides to be ∞. This is neither +∞ nor −∞; for present purposes it makes sense to add just one point at infinity to the real line, that is approached by tan(θ) as tan(θ) either increases through positive values or decreases through negative values. This is a one-point compactification of the real line.)
(The first three equalities are trivial; the fourth is the substance of this identity.) Essentially this is Ptolemy's theorem adapted to the language of trigonometry.
For some purposes it is important to know that any linear combination of sine waves of the same period but different phase shifts is also a sine wave with the same period, but a different phase shift. In the case of a linear combination of a sine and cosine wave, we have
where
More generally, for an arbitrary phase shift, we have
Sum of sines and cosines with arguments in arithmetic progression:
For any a and b:
where arctan(y, x) is the generalization of arctan(y/x) which covers the entire circular range (see also the account of this same identity in "symmetry, periodicity, and shifts" above for this generalization of arctan).
The above identity is sometimes convenient to know when thinking about the Gudermanian function.
If x, y, and z are the three angles of any triangle, i.e. if x + y + z = π, then
This notation was more common in the post WWII era when typewriters were used to convey mathematical expressions.
Superscripts are both offset vertically and smaller than 'cis' or 'exp'; hence, they can be problematic even for hand writing. For example e<sup> ix²</sup> versus cis(x²) versus exp(ix²). For many readers, cis(x²) is the clearest, easiest to read of the three.
The cis notation is sometimes used to emphasize one method of viewing and dealing with a problem over another. The mathematics of trigonometry and exponentials are related but not exactly the same; exponential notation emphasizes the whole, whereas cis and cos + i sin notations emphasize the parts. This can be rhetorically useful to mathematicians and engineers when discussing this function, and further serve as a mnemonic (for cos + i sin).
The cis notation is convenient for math students whose knowledge of trigonometry and complex numbers permit this notation, but whose conceptual understanding doesn't yet permit the notation e<sup> ix</sup>. As students learn concepts that build on prior knowledge, it is important not to force them into levels of math they are not yet prepared for.
In some contexts, the cis notation may serve the pedagogical purpose of emphasizing that one has not yet proved that this is an exponential function. In doing trigonometry without complex numbers, one may prove the two identities
Similarly in treating multiplication of complex numbers (with no involvement of trigonometry), one may observe that the real and imaginary parts of the product of c<sub>1</sub> + is<sub>1</sub> and c<sub>2</sub> + is<sub>2</sub> are respectively
<math>c_1 c_2 - s_1 s_2,\,</math>
<math>s_1 c_2 + c_1 s_2.\,</math>
Thus one sees this same pattern arising in two disparate contexts:
trigonometry without complex numbers, and
complex numbers without trigonometry.
This coincidence can serve as a motivation for conjoining the two contexts and thereby discovering the trigonometric identity
and observing that this identity for cis of a sum is simpler than the identities for sin and cos of a sum. Having proved this identity, one can challenge the students to recall which familiar sort of function satisfies this same functional equation
<math>f(x+y) = f(x)f(y).\,</math>
The answer is exponential functions. That suggests that cis may be an exponential function
<math>\operatorname{cis}(x) = b^x.\,</math>
Then the question is: what is the base b? The definition of cis and the local behavior of sin and cos near zero suggest that
(where dx is an infinitesimal increment of x). Thus the rate of change at 0 is i, so the base should be e<sup>i</sup>. Thus if this is an exponential function, then it must be
is a special case of an identity that contains one variable:
A similar-looking identity is
and in addition
The following is perhaps not as readily generalized to an identity containing variables:
Degree measure ceases to be more felicitous than radian measure when we consider this identity with 21 in the denominators:
The factors 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 10 may start to make the pattern clear: they are those integers less than 21/2 that are relatively prime to (or have no prime factors in common with) 21. The last several examples are corollaries of a basic fact about the irreducible cyclotomic polynomials: the cosines are the real parts of the zeroes of those polynomials; the sum of the zeroes is the Möbius function evaluated at (in the very last case above) 21; only half of the zeroes are present above. The two identities preceding this last one arise in the same fashion with 21 replaced by 10 and 15, respectively.
An efficient way to compute π is based on the following identity without variables, due to Machin:
In calculus the relations stated below require angles to be measured in radians; the relations would become more complicated if angles were measured in another unit such as degrees. If the trigonometric functions are defined in terms of geometry, their derivatives can be found by verifying two limits. The first is:
verified using the unit circle and squeeze theorem. It may be tempting to propose to use L'Hôpital's rule to establish this limit. However, if one uses this limit in order to prove that the derivative of the sine is the cosine, and then uses the fact that the derivative of the sine is the cosine in applying L'Hôpital's rule, one is reasoning circularly—a logical fallacy. The second limit is:
verified using the identity tan(x/2) = (1 − cos(x))/sin(x). Having established these two limits, one can use the limit definition of the derivative and the addition theorems to show that sin′(x) = cos(x) and cos′(x) = −sin(x). If the sine and cosine functions are defined by their Taylor series, then the derivatives can be found by differentiating the power series term-by-term.
The rest of the trigonometric functions can be differentiated using the above identities and the rules of derivative:
The fact that the differentiation of trigonometric functions (sine and cosine) results in linear combinations of the same two functions is of fundamental importance to many fields of mathematics, including differential equations and fourier transformations.
चरघातांकी वाली परिभाषाएँ (Exponential definitions)