सदस्य वार्ता:Mayurkumar/पुरालेख07
विषय जोड़ेंMy adminship review
[संपादित करें]Review my adminship request at- http://sa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%80%E0%A4%A1%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AD%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B7%E0%A4%A3%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D:%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%AC%E0%A4%82%E0%A4%A7%E0%A4%95#Me_for_Admin.21.21 --हर्षवर्धनः (Leodescal) ०७:५७, २४ अष्टोबर् २०११ (UTC)
निवेदन.
[संपादित करें]आपसे कुछ निवेदन हैं:
- अंग्रेज़ी में लिखी fully protected template:PD-self को कृपया हिन्दी में लिखी template:PD-Self पर पुनर्निर्देशित कर दें।
- कृपया बताएँ कि श्रेणी:किताब मुखपृष्ठ में जिन चित्रों पर उचित उपयोग औचित्य(fair use rationale) नहीं है, उनका क्या किया जाए? इनपर यदि उचित साँचा लगा भी दिया जाए तो भी इनका स्रोत ढूँढना मुश्किल होगा
धन्यवाद--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 19:01, 12 अक्टूबर 2011 (UTC)
- Most of the images are taken from this website (for Hindi books, English novels can be checked on English Wikipedia like Harry Potter), and those which have no source information are eligible for deletion—in which images are tagged with {{nsd}}, uploader is notified, and after one week they can be deleted without giving any further warning/message. — Bill william comptonTalk 21:41, 12 अक्टूबर 2011 (UTC)
- But if we can be sure of the source, wouldn't adding an FUR template to them be a better solution?--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 23:05, 12 अक्टूबर 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, efforts should be made to fix the description, if possible. But remaining, with incomplete use rationale, are nominee for deletion. — Bill william comptonTalk 12:52, 13 अक्टूबर 2011 (UTC)
- I do agree with Bill--Mayur (talk•Email) 17:00, 17 अक्टूबर 2011 (UTC)
- But if we can be sure of the source, wouldn't adding an FUR template to them be a better solution?--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 23:05, 12 अक्टूबर 2011 (UTC)
Files without a license
[संपादित करें]Hi! All or most of these files विशेष:UncategorizedFiles do not have a license but is protected so I can't edit them. I wanted to add a "no license" tag/category. At least one of the files is also on Commons so it could be deleted. Perhaps you could have a look at the files one day? Thank you. --MGA73 (वार्ता) 14:56, 15 अक्टूबर 2011 (UTC)
- you can do that using AWB as we all can not edit "special" namespace.Thank you for such a nice work in Hindi Wikipedia--Mayur (talk•Email) 05:02, 16 अक्टूबर 2011 (UTC)
I'm happy that I can help :-) When I try to edit चित्र:03032009283.jpg I get this message:
- You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
- This page has been protected from editing, because it is included in the following page, which is protected with the "cascading" option turned on:
- विकिपीडिया:आज का आलेख - पुरालेख/२००९/मार्च
- Return to चित्र:03032009283.jpg.
I do not think that using AWB would make a difference. I think you need to be an admin to edit? --MGA73 (वार्ता) 20:45, 16 अक्टूबर 2011 (UTC)
Please take a look at this user
[संपादित करें]Special:Contributions/Ankuranand He removed large portions of a page several times. Thanks. Bennylin (वार्ता) 10:40, 17 अक्टूबर 2011 (UTC)
- I have given last warning to user, his edits were non constructive and disruptive--Mayur (talk•Email) 16:58, 17 अक्टूबर 2011 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 21:33, 23 अक्टूबर 2011 (UTC)
AfD debates
[संपादित करें]Hi Mayur, please share your thoughts and input about "Article for deletion" process on Chopal. I need your help to keep the process running! It will help us with a platform regarding controversial deletions. I'm leaving same message on Siddhartha's talk page — Bill william comptonTalk 12:46, 27 अक्टूबर 2011 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 22:08, 27 अक्टूबर 2011 (UTC)
सहायता
[संपादित करें]मयूरजी नमस्कार। कृपया हमें इस त्रुटि से उभरने के लिए सहयोग करें। और नेपाली विकि में भी हिन्दी और अंग्रेजी विकि में जैसा पृष्ठ के अन्त मे Page Rating लाने के लिए भी सहयोग करें।भवानी गौतम (वार्ता) 09:00, 29 अक्टूबर 2011 (UTC)
- Partially fixed. ne:template:zero में कुछ परिवर्तन कर के त्रुटि उत्पन्न होना तो बंद हो गई है, परंतु examples में दिये उत्तर अभी सब ठीक नहीं हुए हैं।--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 11:19, 29 अक्टूबर 2011 (UTC)
- Page ratings के लिये आपको नेपाली विकि पे Article feedback extension समर्थ करवानी होगी--Mayur (talk•Email) 03:46, 6 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Mass Bot import of templates
[संपादित करें]User:RajeshBot का प्रयोग कर के 1500 से अधिक साँचे बिना समुदाय से बातचीत किये और बिना स्रोत url दिये अंग्रेज़ी विकिपीडिया से कॉपी पेस्ट किये गए हैं(देखें Special:Contributions/RajeshBot)। यह साँचे सभी अंग्रेज़ी नाम के हैं। इन साँचों को ऐसे कॉपी करने से इन सब के लाइसेंस गलत होते हैं(Attribution is not in place)। साथ ही मेरे विचार में इन साँचों की यहाँ कोई आवश्यकता नहीं है। अतः अनुरोध है कि इन साँचों को जल्द-से-जल्द हटाया जाए। मैं ne विकिपीडिया पर इस बॉट के संचालक को इस वार्ता की कड़ी प्रदान कर रहा हूँ ताकि वे ऐसा करने का अपने कारण यहाँ रख पायें। साथ ही अनुरोध है कि विकिपीडिया:प्रबंधक सूचनापट का सुरक्षा स्तर घटाकर autoconfirmed कर दें ताकि प्रबंधक वर्ग से सम्बन्धित वार्ता इस पृष्ठ पर हो सके। जहाँ तक मेरी जानकारी है, यह पृष्ठ प्रबंधकों को किसी बात से अवगत कराने के लिये है, अतः सभी सदस्यों को इसे संपादित कर इसमें विषय जोड़ने की अनुमति होनी चाहिए। धन्यवाद--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 21:43, 2 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Siddhartha Ghai जी आप का सुझाव सही है। वे सभी हिन्दी विकी में अति आवश्यक साँचे थे जो Special:WantedTemplates में दर्ज थे । (These templates were listed in the Special:WantedTemplates. All of these templates had at least two links from the articles. --RajeshPandey (वार्ता) 04:21, 3 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- राजेश जी, मैं मानता हूँ कि ये साँचे Special:WantedTemplates पर थे, परंतु इसका ये अर्थ नहीं कि ऐसे सभी साँचे अंग्रेज़ी विकिपीडिया से लिये जाएँ। यह बात सभी जानते हैं कि हिन्दी विकिपीडिया पर कई लेख अंग्रेज़ी लेखों के मशीनी अनुवाद हैं, और ये सभी कोई बहुत अच्छी हालत में नहीं हैं। ये अंग्रेज़ी साँचे मुख्य रूप से इन्हीं लेखों पर प्रयोग होते हैं। यदि ये साँचे Special:WantedTemplates में थे, तो वे इन्हीं लेखों में कमियों के कारण थे, अतः हमें ऐसे लेखों को ढूंढ कर उनमें से ऐसे साँचों का प्रयोग हटाना चाहिए अथवा ऐसे साँचे हिन्दी विकिपीडिया पर स्वयं बनाने चाहियें(हिन्दी नाम और हिन्दी सामग्री के साथ)। यदि हम इसी प्रकार सिर्फ़ मशीनी अनुवाद जोड़ते रहें और साँचे कॉपी करते रहें तो हिन्दी विकिपीडिया की गुणवत्ता के स्तर का क्या हाल होगा? साथ ही, यदि आप en:Special:WantedTemplates देखेंगे तो पायेंगे कि वहाँ बी भी बहुत से साँचों की आवश्यकता है, परंतु उन्हें बॉट का प्रयोग करके नहीं बनाया जाता बलकी सदस्य स्वयं उन्हें बनाते हैं। अतः, मेरा अनुरोध है कि इन साँचों को कॉपीराइट की समस्या के कारण हटा दिया जाए और फिर जिन लेखों में इन साँचों का प्रयोग है, उन्हें सुधारा जाए। भले ही ये मुश्किल मार्ग है, परंतु सोना आग से गुज़ेर के ही कुंदन बनता है। हमें भी हिन्दी विकिपीडिया पर उसी प्रकार मेहनत करनी होगी, चाहे उसमें समय ही क्यों न लगे।--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 16:01, 3 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- @Sid, It is controversial that Copy paste from one wiki to another is copyvio.However it depend on Community whether they want for such kind of situation.In case of en wiki and hi wiki there is no general consensus over this.
- @Rajeshpandey, Siddharath just said that such a huge automated addition should be done after getting community consensus.if Community has no objection then you can just do your task.However don't bother i shall delete these all templates if required. I think rather than creating such templates by bot you should import such templates that will resolve the whole problem.Cheers--Mayur (talk•Email) 17:29, 3 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Copy pasting from one WMF wiki to another without source attribution is copyright violation. See en:Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia for details.--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 18:01, 3 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- It still depend on local community however Importing will not disturb such Policy as it show original user name in History but directly copy & paste violate this policy that's why i advised rajesh to use importing those pages rather than copy paste directly through bot.Still I am confused for applying this policy for Hindi wiki it will be better if bill can also give his opinion--Mayur (talk•Email) 18:18, 3 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- There are few things I'd like to clarify regarding the license policy of Wikipedia: all the text (including under namespace like template, category, etc) is released under CCA-SA 3.0, which requires attribution—even if it is copied or transferred from Sister Wikimedia Project (the Wiki jargon of the moment is "terms of use"). If strictly following CC licensing and United States Copyright Law, CC licenses require users to attribute the original creator(s) of a work, unless the creator has waived that requirement or asked that his/her name be removed from an adaptation or collection. So, IMHO transferring templates like this require attribution to original creator(s), and WMF has suggested a few handy ways for this, like using {{interwiki copy}} template. And, Mayur there can't be any possible "general consensus" for this, because it'd violate CC policy of Wikimedia. Yes, need of attribution may not be required for template if it contains entirely different content (or translated) because rest is just Wiki markup coding.
- Now about the usability of these bulk templates on Hindi Wikipedia. As Sid said above, these templates are mostly used in machine translated articles (or in articles of Google Project), a usual procedure in which people just—without giving adequate attention—copy whole text from English Wikipedia articles, and leave many red-links (like categories, templates, interwikis, etc); but these red-links certainly don't need copy/paste method, so in simple words "we don't need them here". Rajesh, your rationale that "All of these templates had at least two links from the articles" is also not endurable, e.g. {{Tourism}} has only one link which is on ट्रैवल एजेंसी—a Google translated article. Mayur, "it [doesn't] show original user name in History" [sic] (does it?). IMO this automated process is destructive and just increasing garbage on Hindi Wikipedia. — Bill william comptonTalk 13:45, 4 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- In reply to comment "it [doesn't] show original user name in History" [sic] (does it?)", Bill I m talking about importing these templates not copy and paste if you import any template then it show original user in history rajesh just copied and pasted templates, importing is quite different. Here is the example of importing, Cheers--Mayur (talk•Email) 16:40, 4 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Oh! I misinterpreted, mea culpa. — Bill william comptonTalk 16:55, 4 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Sid, Mayur and everyone for taking it positively. Originally the intention was to save users from the hectic work of copying the wiki jargon, styles and formatting that exist in templates. A normal user might get frustrated by a red link in an article and there are thousands of such wanted templates that are available in enwiki. Among those templates, some are translated, some are used as-it-is like the php-programs which come with the mediawiki software(obviously lot of folks worked day and night for it, and we should give credits to them), and we have become rich by adopting those templates. Its like the languages, the more words we take in a language, the more richer we become example Glass to Paper, shirt and pant, and a lot many. Templates are midway between the mediawiki software and the general text. Any user can create a template and put a programming logic inside it. The programmers use it as the building blocks and try to reuse it. At most places people write ifelse braces left and braces right, parameters and stuffs that a new user may not understand while an advanced user understands it(at most cases). Its a mystery for another user : what exists inside a template, untill he does not test the template himself or read the template documentations very carefeully. We can work on the shortcomings in the Wanted-Templates. At the end all the effort is for the betterment of the wiki. If these templates are really harmful may be we should delete them. May be mass copying is not so good, because it might be dreadful at some instances. May be we feel insecure about the bots. No doubt human editors are better than bots and bots are meant to serve humans. May be we should delete the poor articles with those templates. The community can flag the articles that are poor in quality, as they are being done everyday as in the articles in Category:Delete. All the possibilities below are possible. Thanks to the mediawiki software, all the edits can be reverted, deleted or edited. The solution to the the red links of the templates (that have been staying there for long) in the articles might be : 1) by deleting the article 2) deleting the template link 3) creating the template properly by fixing all the links. Its up to the community to decide. --(Rajesh वार्ता) 18:30, 4 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Oh! I misinterpreted, mea culpa. — Bill william comptonTalk 16:55, 4 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- In reply to comment "it [doesn't] show original user name in History" [sic] (does it?)", Bill I m talking about importing these templates not copy and paste if you import any template then it show original user in history rajesh just copied and pasted templates, importing is quite different. Here is the example of importing, Cheers--Mayur (talk•Email) 16:40, 4 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- It still depend on local community however Importing will not disturb such Policy as it show original user name in History but directly copy & paste violate this policy that's why i advised rajesh to use importing those pages rather than copy paste directly through bot.Still I am confused for applying this policy for Hindi wiki it will be better if bill can also give his opinion--Mayur (talk•Email) 18:18, 3 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Copy pasting from one WMF wiki to another without source attribution is copyright violation. See en:Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia for details.--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 18:01, 3 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Just clarifying once again, Rajesh. Copying templates using bots is not ok if you don't provide the source attribution, because that violates the WMF terms of use and implies copyright violation. Source attribution is a must, which is missing in the bot transfer of templates.
- If this attribution had been present, then it would have been up to the community to decide whether or not to keep these templates. But, without the attribution, we are (legally) bound by the Terms of Use to delete these templates(We don't have a choice in this).
- So next time you wish to import ,either use Special:Import; or if you do use a bot; get it to at least add a summary like: "copy from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/template:xyz&oldid=1234567890". Note that a permanent link to the page is required, not a simple page link, since that can change. Hope this clears the problem with these imports.--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 21:39, 5 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Sid for clarifying. Providing "oldid=1234567890" is a favorable option. --RajeshPandey (वार्ता) 06:13, 7 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- So next time you wish to import ,either use Special:Import; or if you do use a bot; get it to at least add a summary like: "copy from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/template:xyz&oldid=1234567890". Note that a permanent link to the page is required, not a simple page link, since that can change. Hope this clears the problem with these imports.--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 21:39, 5 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Now that it is clear that these templates are copyright violations and the uploader has no problems in their deletion, I request that they be nuked.--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 23:42, 9 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Useless protection of pages
[संपादित करें]Mayur, I'm concerned that many pages are edit protected for no use. This is a misuse of page-protection privilege, like why on this earth प्रवेशद्वार:तमिल नाडु/चयनित जीवनी is edit protected if it never had any history of persistent vandalism. These type of pages hinder me from doing my work, like I needed to replace the redundant image in this page with one on Commons after deleting चित्र:CVRaman.jpg but I couldn't do that because page is edit protected even for auto-confirmed users. Please follow the protocol and make these types of pages editable, merci. — Bill william comptonTalk 16:00, 4 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Not Done, As this page was not protected--Mayur (talk•Email) 16:42, 4 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)- Done, I just saw that page was redirected--Mayur (talk•Email) 16:50, 4 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Files nominated for deletion
[संपादित करें]Hi! I have a list of files nominated for deletion here: सदस्य:MGA73/Sandbox. Perhaps you can help me translate the text? My idea is to inform all the uploaders that one or more of their files are nominated for deletion and give them the list. I have problems adding a notice with my bot because of the "funny" letters :-D - if you have a solution or can fix it with your bot it would be super. If not I'll add the notices manually. By the way - your name is on the list सदस्य:MGA73/Sandbox#User:Mayur :-) --MGA73 (वार्ता) 19:29, 4 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help. Guess there is no need to inform सदस्य:Rajeevmass because user is blocked and can not fix the license. --MGA73 (वार्ता) 22:26, 5 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- If you could help watch the changes made on files for example this and any replies on the user talk pages it would be a great help. --MGA73 (वार्ता) 19:22, 6 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
AWB
[संपादित करें]I left a request at http://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%80%E0%A4%A1%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%BE_%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BE:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage for you Zscout370 (वार्ता) 19:37, 5 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Done with Welcome to Hindi Wikipedia--Mayur (talk•Email) 03:33, 6 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
This needs to be replaced with चित्र:Flag of India.svg Zscout370 (वार्ता) 20:45, 7 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Hi! The user is blocked so informing the user will not help. Any ideas? I think that File:Hswastika.jpg could probably be changed to PD-ineligible and some of the other files may be from another wiki. --MGA73 (वार्ता) 07:26, 9 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- No need to change it in anything as similar file is available on Commons, actually a better SVG version. Just replace usage of this file with one from Commons. — Bill william comptonTalk 12:05, 9 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Agreed. My point is that normally it would be a good idea to wait 2 weeks before files are deleted because it gives uploader a chance to add a valid license. However, there is no reason to wait the usual 2 weeks with this user because the user can not add a license as long as he is blocked. Therefor I did not give uploader a notice and a message "Could you please add a license...". Only chance to keep the files is if we can add one ourself. --MGA73 (वार्ता) 14:34, 9 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- I just checked above images, these are available in en wiki article with different names so we can rename it or can replace those images with en wiki images--Mayur (talk•Email) 17:23, 9 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Agreed. My point is that normally it would be a good idea to wait 2 weeks before files are deleted because it gives uploader a chance to add a valid license. However, there is no reason to wait the usual 2 weeks with this user because the user can not add a license as long as he is blocked. Therefor I did not give uploader a notice and a message "Could you please add a license...". Only chance to keep the files is if we can add one ourself. --MGA73 (वार्ता) 14:34, 9 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Mayur, Just to make you aware that this is a maintenance category, which shouldn't be deleted. It is used in the argument of parser function used in {{Db-c1}}, and pages from श्रेणी:शीघ्र हटाने योग्य श्रेणियाँ are transferred into this four days after they are tagged, so you may find it empty. — Bill william comptonTalk 18:51, 10 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I have protected it from deletion.Now No one can delete this category.Actually due to mass deletion i was not able to see this in the forest of massive yearly categories.Cheers--Mayur (talk•Email) 19:43, 11 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
NoArticleText
[संपादित करें]चित्र:Wiktprintable without text Hindi.svg को लाइसेंस रहित होने के कारण हटा दिया गया है, परंतु इसका प्रयोग उन पृष्ठों पर होता है जो अभी बने नहीं हैं, उदाहरण मैकबुक। साथ ही, इन पृष्ठों पर विक्षनरी का लिंक हिन्दी विक्षनरी का होना चाहिये और विकिस्रोत का लिंक wikisource.org का होना चाहिये, न कि en.wikisource.org का। कृपया इसे ठीक करें। --सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 11:27, 11 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
missing bureaucrat noticeboard on this wiki - usurp User:Joy
[संपादित करें]Sadly, I have received no response about this issue. Can you please rename the current User:Joy here, to some other name, so that I can have my edits here? These 4 edits are all mine, imported from the English Wikipedia, and they're being attributed to some unknown person instead of myself. --Joy-temporary (वार्ता) 14:34, 11 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, I got the account now, but my edits still went to the other user, per Special:Contributions/Joy-temp.
- I found out at https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26942 that you can't reassign them.
- But can you instead please just delete them? You don't need them any more. --Joy (वार्ता) 23:57, 12 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Not done,Plz nominate those pages for deletions citing your reason, Hindi Wiki eliminator user group takes care of this.Thanks--Mayur (talk•Email) 05:03, 13 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of साँचा:Infobox indian epic
[संपादित करें]A tag has been placed on साँचा:Infobox indian epic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 21:22, 11 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Done, deleted myself--Mayur (talk•Email) 05:00, 13 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Images are protected
[संपादित करें]Hi! Most of the images here http://toolserver.org/~multichill/nowcommons.php?language=hi are protected so I can not add a NowCommons. Perhaps you could remove the protection or fix/delete the files? Thank you. --MGA73 (वार्ता) 21:12, 12 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Done, Added to NowCommons, Cheers--Mayur (talk•Email) 04:56, 13 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. I wonder if प्रवेशद्वार:हाल की घटनाएँ/घटनाएँ/नवम्बर २००८ needs to be fully protected or it could be removed or reduced? I would like to replace the image of Obama with the better file on Commons. --MGA73 (वार्ता) 16:01, 13 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Done, Now it is Semiprotected--Mayur (talk•Email) 17:04, 13 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 14:27, 13 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
Please comment regarding a new upload form. सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 14:28, 13 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 16:42, 13 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
Regarding the upload form. सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 16:48, 13 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
My last thought was right, is this one?
[संपादित करें]अमित दरम्वाल PiRSquared17 (वार्ता) 03:56, 14 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, that one too.cheers--Mayur (talk•Email) 17:23, 14 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Deleted as unambiguous promotion.--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 05:27, 14 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 16:24, 14 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 19:00, 14 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Could you add a license?
[संपादित करें]Hi! Most of the files on विशेष:UncategorizedFiles is protected so I can't edit them. Could you add a relevant fair use tag on चित्र:Rab ne.jpg and चित्र:Wings of Fire.jpg? And a PD-text on चित्र:Devnagari-help-image.png, चित्र:Hi-Sitenotice.PNG and चित्र:Hi-Sitenotice.png? Or the unused could also be deleted. --MGA73 (वार्ता) 22:11, 17 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Delete/undelete
[संपादित करें]Hi! I just noticed that my bot can delete files but it can't undelete. So if I make a mistake I can't fix it. Any ideas? Other than make no mistakes :-D Perhaps my "MGA73" account should be "Eliminator" or something. As I understand it that would allow me to undelete. --MGA73 (वार्ता) 14:30, 19 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Soon this problem will be resolved I have filed a bug for this in bugzilla.Till you can take my help.--Mayur (talk•Email) 15:24, 19 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. --MGA73 (वार्ता) 15:43, 19 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Done, problem has been resolved by shell developers--Mayur (talk•Email) 17:44, 20 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. Tested and working :-) --MGA73 (वार्ता) 18:01, 20 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Done, problem has been resolved by shell developers--Mayur (talk•Email) 17:44, 20 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. --MGA73 (वार्ता) 15:43, 19 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Image replacement from fully protected pages
[संपादित करें]Hi Mayur, as I can't edit protected pages, so please replace file Abhinav Bindra.jpg with Abhinav Bindra01.jpg from {{आज का आलेख १४ फरवरी २००९}} and {{आज का आलेख २६ जुलाई २००९}}, regards. — Bill william comptonTalk 12:28, 22 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Done
- Don't you think that file mover right will be useful for you for doing such tasks.You can rename all non liecensed files to files available in commons.Cheers--Mayur (talk•Email) 12:36, 22 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah I know, but I don't have this privilege. Would you be kind enough to grant me that right? — Bill william comptonTalk 12:52, 22 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Done and just wait one week for clear consensus for Sr. User group.if nobody opposes you will be assigned that group--Mayur (talk•Email) 13:42, 22 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah I know, but I don't have this privilege. Would you be kind enough to grant me that right? — Bill william comptonTalk 12:52, 22 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Don't you think that file mover right will be useful for you for doing such tasks.You can rename all non liecensed files to files available in commons.Cheers--Mayur (talk•Email) 12:36, 22 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
कोपीराइट चित्र
[संपादित करें]मयुरजी, आपने मेरे चर्चा के पन्ने पर संदेशा छोडा उसके लिए धन्यवाद। वह सभी चित्र हमारे ध्यानमें है ही। हम अभी उन चित्रो का क्या किया जाये यह डिस्कस कर रहे है। आपने अपने बॉट से जो काम किया है उसके लिए एक बार फीर से आपका आभारी हुं। भविष्यमें गुजराती के लीए कुछभी काम हो बे़जि़झक मेरा संपर्क किजियेगा, क्युंकी मै अकेलाही वहां सक्रिय एडमिनिस्ट्रेटर हुं।--धवलवार्ता/योगदान 15:42, 22 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
hey hi
[संपादित करें]Hey hi, thanx for the tea, :D I'm designing an infobox for video games, do you have any experience in infobox creations? If yes, then I would appreciate your help regarding that. Thanks Ashliveslove (वार्ता) 06:48, 23 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- For creation of infobox the simple procedure is-
- First of all search the same info box in English or some other wiki.Like in your case you should first of all copy and paste Template:Infobox_video_game & Template:Infobox_video_game/doc file from en Wiki.Just mention link from where you copied it in edit summary.
- After replace en words with hindi word both in Template:Infobox_video_game & Template:Infobox_video_game/doc.
- after that Ifobox will be ready
Cheers--Mayur (talk•Email) 07:20, 23 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
A message
[संपादित करें]Hello Mayur, I've sent a problem of mine thru e-mail. Plz check that out. Thanks. -Hemant wikikoshवार्ता 10:30, 23 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the image
[संपादित करें]Thanx for the image yaar. else I would have to wait to be autoconfirmed. :) ASHUIND 08:03, 24 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- We are happy to get a very good editor like you, Hindi Wikipedia needs editors like you.Due to your editing spirit.You are most welcome here--Mayur (talk•Email) 08:06, 24 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Again protected page
[संपादित करें]Mayur, you redirected चित्र:Wiktionary small logo.png to चित्र:Wiktsister en.png, but perhaps you forget that redirection doesn't work with files. The file was used on main page under "विकिपीडिया के बन्धु प्रकल्प" and now you can see how it looks. As, I can't edit main page, so please replace this link with चित्र:Wiktsister en.png as soon as possible because main page is the portal of Wikipedia. — Bill william comptonTalk 10:54, 24 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Done, Thanks--Mayur (talk•Email) 11:25, 24 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
A few files for you to check
[संपादित करें]Hi! I do not understand why you moved your userpage and talk page around and deleted it. But I hope this is the right place to write to you. There are 4 files left on विशेष:UncategorizedFiles that needs to be fixed:
3 of them are uploaded by you. --MGA73 (वार्ता) 20:08, 24 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- All have been fixed, Cheers--Mayur (talk•Email) 19:24, 25 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you very much... Just looked at विशेष:UncategorizedFiles and .... nothing to see :-D --MGA73 (वार्ता) 21:04, 25 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Another replacement
[संपादित करें]Mayur, I'm kind of shocked seeing your user and talk page. What happened? I hope everything is fine. If you have the time then please replace चित्र:Indianflag.gif with File:India flag-XL-anim.gif, thanks and regards. — Bill william comptonTalk 23:20, 24 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Nothing Happened I was just planing for retirement from wikipedia:-).But you still remind me that it still have my need.BTW I have fixed above images.Cheers--Mayur (talk•Email) 19:26, 25 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Mayur, you're the lifeline of Hindi Wikipedia. Don't you ever think about leaving. I can't imagine what forced you to think like that but we all have had obstacles, and we need to overcome them. Still? I think Hindi Wikipedia will always need you. So, as a friend, this is my humble request to you to flourish Hindi Wikipedia under your supervision. — Bill william comptonTalk 20:57, 25 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Regarding Infoboxes
[संपादित करें]Hi again, I need help regarding protection of templates. Do you have admin rights to do so? There are so many templates for the same purpose and I would appreciate help from you to make one single template discarding the others to maintain unity in all articles related to that genre. For example have a look at these two articles.
Both have two different infoboxes. I noticed this after looking at the second articles. Both infoboxes were there before my jump in Hindi wiki. I think the one on Desi Boyz is default one since its modified from the one present on English wiki where as the one on Namaste London is created by a user.
See what you can do in this case so that I can atleast make sure which one to use. If you delete any of the one then make a redirect of that to the correct one since many articles are those too.
Thanks ASHUIND 10:03, 25 नवम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Few quarries and other stuff
[संपादित करें]Hi Mayur, I've few proposals and queries. First, replace File:Fairytale bookmark gold.png with File:Cscr-featured.svg as a symbol of featured content on Hindi Wikipedia, because the proposed one gives sense of seriousness and assiduousness. Second, decide a single title for selected content, meaning either use निर्वाचित लेख or प्रमुख लेख to remove confusion—maintaining stability. Third, restart the whole project of good articles (श्रेष्ठ लेख) on Hindi Wikipedia; this restarting of project would also include delisting of all present good articles because people tag their own creation with GA template without any formal nomination procedure. Fourth, I need a permission to write the विकिपीडिया:श्रेष्ठ लेख मापदंड सम्पादन, so that users may know about the criteria of good article. Fifth, I need to restart a selection of featured pictures also, because many present featured pictures on Hindi Wikipedia are not fit for the so-called status. These are my few efforts to improve the featured content on Hindi Wikipedia, thanks and regards. — Bill william comptonTalk 13:01, 1 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Regarding the star for FA and FL status, I think that we should have something different from en(not entirely different; but not the same copied either). Maybe someone could make a good SVG for that? I'm quite new to those, so it'd take me a lot of time(months) before I can come up with something good.
- I haven't seen the use of प्रमुख लेख anywhere(or maybe I've forgotten). Could someone clarify where this is in use? I favor the use of निर्वाचित over प्रमुख btw.
- I'm not really in favour of delisting all articles just like that. I think we can get them cleaned up while creating new policies for GAs(just like the new upload page for images came up while we were clearing up images) :) However, you're free to write up a criteria
- As for the featured pictures, I don't think we should select them from hi at all(or if we do, we move them to commons since fair-use images cant be featured). And I'm seriously hoping to move all free images to commons in the forseeable future; so here are some ideas for an FPC:
- It should be Own Work of a wikimedian(any registered user on any WMF wiki). Works from flickr or pd-old images don't count.
- It should be under a free license on commons
- It should actually be in use on hi-wp in a non-stub
- It would be best to avoid giving FPs from commons FP status here. It would be better to pick a non-FP on commons, get it FPed here, and then try to FP it on commons. This way, both projects improve without us doing only copying.
- Bill, I hope this helps. Regards--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 14:40, 1 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Regarding GA's, as SIddhartha said about clean up, we can only clean up those who deserve a clean up at all. As you can see there are more than 6000 pages with that template and category. Regarding FA's symbol, if you want I'll make and upload one and you can see it, if you like that than you can go for it as I've already created a GA symbol here (). आशूबातकरें 14:54, 1 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- I meant cleaning up the GA category of those articles which don't deserve to be GAs, not cleaning up the articles themselves only for the sake of justifying the category's existence. In other terms, I meant: Take a look at all/almost all 6000 articles in the category and remove any that do not deserve the tag. And even though it might seem a bit optimistic, I sincerely believe that its doable.(Of course we should remember that we don't have a deadline anyways :) ).
- As for the new GA symbol, I greatly appreciate the work you have done but I just don't see it fit to have a symbol based on the tricolor as the symbol for GAs, since wikipedia is not for Indian articles only, and we should not limit the symbolism to any particular country. I'd therefore like to request you to make two symbols; one for GAs, and one for FAs(both neutral), since I really like the icon you created. I hope you won't take this the wrong way. Regards--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 17:24, 1 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- No problem with that, will just change the color combination of the icon. It was merely a test since i was checking for it's appearance as a top icon. will update a newer version for the same image. आशूबातकरें 17:32, 1 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Regarding GA's, as SIddhartha said about clean up, we can only clean up those who deserve a clean up at all. As you can see there are more than 6000 pages with that template and category. Regarding FA's symbol, if you want I'll make and upload one and you can see it, if you like that than you can go for it as I've already created a GA symbol here (). आशूबातकरें 14:54, 1 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Here are the updates Icons.
- If any improvement is needed then feel free to say. आशूबातकरें 17:52, 1 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- For FA I think (, (, ( are better.However I liked the second one as it also show wiki globe.
@Bill,
- You can make a draft for Good and Featured content both together on the same page.We shall also give some suggestions after that you may declare it as final.
- For Featured content icon i agree with sid that we should have some different than english wiki i have suggested some plz choose if you have a better image than plz suggest it.
- I shall decategorise all good articles as they were categorised by my bot so there is no sense to keep them.I just categorised them as per their size not by quality.We should fill this category by using AWB.
- We all you, sid, ashu and me can work on selection of new good articles.
- I shall make a abuse filter that will ban addtion of good article templates and category but I think we should choose one, two or three person who should have this permission otherwise any admin, sr user can also do this without community approval.The process should be as-
- Make a Single page for featured content
- Make a committee who's member will have access to add these templates of featured content.--Mayur (talk•Email) 08:58, 2 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with you Mayur, the globe icon is best since the first one look more like the GA icon of Eng Wiki. I'm currently working on भारतीय वायुसेना to make it broad and perfect to follow the Good Article conditions. Another one I saw was राम प्रसाद 'बिस्मिल' which is perfect example of a Good Article. आशूबातकरें 09:20, 2 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Answers to all:
- @Sid:Agree, I wasn't even in favor of direct copying from English Wikipedia. I like the procedure of Deutsch Wikipedia (German). They use a symbol like this and declare the version and date when an article was promoted to featured (or worth reading for de.wiki) status.
- Haven't you noticed main page of Hindi Wikipedia?
- By delisting, I meant that we would review them for our new criteria.
- Choosing images from Hindi Wikipedia is not even an option, featured picture candidate on any Wikipedia project should be present on Commons.
- Actually they count, this is a common procedure on all Wikipedia projects that they promote free images available on other repositories like flickr, etc. If we don't include PD-Old then we'll never have historical images as featured ones.
- Agree
- This is a main criteria: "Image should have encyclopedic value".
- It depends upon the project's environment. Many FP of Commons or English Wikipedia don't even have respective articles on Hindi Wikipedia—fails EV criteria". I'm not in favor of including it as criteria, but we'll definitely promote uniqueness.
@Mayur: Okay, I'll start writing the criteria under my userspace.
- Globe-star combination is fine.
- Here, I'm suggesting a formal nomination procedure similar to other Wikipedia projects (en, fr, de):
- User creates/expands article.
- He/she nominates the article, which goes on special page.
- Any autoconfirmed (special requirement, add by me) user can review the article against GAC (good article criteria).
- The review procedure will be carried out on the talk page of the article.
- Only reviewer will have authority to pass/promote the article for GA status.
- Rather than committee we can use GA-bot and FA-bot of English Wikipedia to add the template. But as I said above, only reviewers will have authority to pass the article, and then they can ask bot to tag the article.
@Ashliveslove: राम प्रसाद 'बिस्मिल' article is too far from GA status. It has lots of copyrighted images, lacking inline citations, doesn't follow basic manual of style (over-hyperlinking, obscure section titles, etc), non-neutrality, "इन्हें भी देखें" includes Wikipedia's articles only not external links, etc. — Bill william comptonTalk 12:13, 2 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- @Bill, I think we should categories articles in 4 categories
We can make a page explaining all in Wikipedia namespace. I agree with reviewer idea rather than a separate committee. For now I shall transfer all Uttam lekh to Normal Article(मध्यम लेख) category. --Mayur (talk•Email) 12:30, 2 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
@All(choose what's relevant to you :) )
- Articles
- I agree that we need to separate आधार(stubs), मध्यम लेख(normal), निर्वाचित लेख(featured) and GAs(उत्तम लेख/श्रेष्ठ लेख, whichever seems better).
- We do need a GA criteria. And I'd rather prefer different pages for an FA criteria and GA criteria.
- I'm fine with the wiki-globe and star logo for FAs. And I like चित्र:Indian_good_article.png by Ashu for tagging GAs.
- As for उत्तम लेख category, after going through it a bit; I think delisting is better than transferring to मध्यम लेख, since I found most of them without a single reference. And I don't think classifying an unreferenced article as "मध्यम" would be right. And since they were bot-tagged by their size, I don't think we can/should count them as "मध्यम" without manual checks anyways.
- प्रमुख vs निर्वाचित: I'd prefer निर्वाचित even on the main page, since प्रमुख doesn't convey the same meaning.
- Images
- OK, I get the point about pd-olds being included. I'm not really enthusiastic about promoting images from flickr but I have no qualms if they're under free licenses and satisfy other conditions.
- And btw, when we are discussing topicons, anyone has suggestions for an FP topicon?--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 13:58, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- The globe-star is for symbolizing the featured content—to maintain stability—which includes articles, lists, pictures, other media, etc. There's no need for separate icons. — Bill william comptonTalk 14:19, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I shall decategorise all Uttam lekhs as it was chosen by me to select content for Hindi Wiki DVD project. I think draft should be prepared on a single page so that it all can be approved together by community consensus. Only globe star icon should be sufficient and better to represent featured content of Hindi Wikipedia per bill. Thank you all--Mayur (talk•Email) 15:01, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- I wished for two different pages for FA and GA standards because:
- It helps keep two separate standards
- Both can be maintained without interference from the other standard
- Getting community consensus step-by-step should be easier than in one go
- We could easily use विकिपीडिया:आकलन as the summary page while maintaining the actual standards at different pages
- Different pages mean different page histories so we can easily see which standards get revised when
- Different pages means different people can work on the criteria without hinderance in the initial development
- We dont know how much the criteria page could expand in the future, so keeping them separate from the start will save us the trouble of a page split in the future
- I hope this helps.--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 15:33, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Sure, we shall make different page for each category but my indication was for draft that is to be prepared by bill under his user subpage.I wanted it in a single page so that our community may approve it on a single place after approval we shall paste them to corresponding pages--Mayur (talk•Email) 16:25, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- I wished for two different pages for FA and GA standards because:
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
Regarding the AfDs of alphabet articles. सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 14:50, 1 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Screenshots
[संपादित करें]Hi! I just asked Bill_william_compton about the screenshots in श्रेणी:Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 images. Looks like you made some of them so I thought you should also be asked :-) --MGA73 (वार्ता) 18:58, 2 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- You can delete all which are being not used anywhere--Mayur (talk•Email) 14:56, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Deleted.. Not sure about this one चित्र:Indic sysops by number of sysop actions.JPG. Would you like to keep it? --MGA73 (वार्ता) 19:58, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- No, as i would have been updated it somewhere but this is not useful now.So you can delete it--Mayur (talk•Email) 20:13, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Deleted.. Not sure about this one चित्र:Indic sysops by number of sysop actions.JPG. Would you like to keep it? --MGA73 (वार्ता) 19:58, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
Regarding pywikipediabot सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 14:33, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 15:01, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
Here's a test case :) सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 15:20, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 15:24, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Abusefilters
[संपादित करें]When you're at making the filters for FA and GA template addition, could you also add one for the dvd category, and something to prevent the following text from being added:
* [[ सर्व शिक्षा मातृभाषामा नहुनु सुक्ष्म गतिमा दास हुनु हो | सर्व शिक्षा मातृभाषामा नहुनु सुक्ष्म गतिमा दास हुनु हो ]] * [[ माताको दुध शिशुलाई शिक्षा मातृभाषामा प्रभाव पर्छ सृष्टिलाई प्रकाशको गतिमा | माताको दुध शिशुलाई शिक्षा मातृभाषामा प्रभाव पर्छ सृष्टिलाई प्रकाशको गतिमा ]]
Removing this text over months is becoming a bit annoying and I was wondering if there was a way to put a permanent stop to it without an IP range block. Thanks--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 15:50, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Done, I have made a filter for that.So only reviewer has right to add these templates now.--Mayur (talk•Email) 17:29, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- And finally a vaccine is ready for such vandalism--Mayur (talk•Email) 17:56, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks :) --सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 18:05, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
— Bill william comptonTalk 16:55, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
— Bill william comptonTalk 17:10, 3 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Another Hell
[संपादित करें]I have nearly delisted all uttam lekh but I observed one similar category Good articles.I don't know who made this category but I think we should make it empty.What do you both think about that--Mayur (talk•Email) 06:21, 4 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- That's easy. That category is added automatically by {{उत्तम लेख}}, so that wouldn't be a problem.--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 06:25, 4 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Yes.My bot was removing only uttam lekh category but template was later added by vibhijainbot which have this good article category.I shall remove it separately after making uttam lekh category empty. --Mayur (talk•Email) 06:31, 4 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Who gave Vibhi authority to take decision regarding this? This is completely obnoxious. Mayur, first delete this template ({{उत्तम लेख}}) as it's useless. Secondly, make all such templates— FA, GA, etc, fully protected. — Bill william comptonTalk 07:11, 4 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry for delay as I was little busy.Can you give me list of such templates to be protected I shall make them protected.Cheers--Mayur (talk•Email) 10:58, 8 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- No problem, I thought you left the thread. Finalization of all the policies, templates and criteria wouldn't be possible in this month as we are all very busy, and I know this is obvious as it's the end of semester. But for precaution, please disable the functionality of adding any quality-judging templates in the articles, so that further misuse can be prevented, thanks. — Bill william comptonTalk 11:48, 8 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry for delay as I was little busy.Can you give me list of such templates to be protected I shall make them protected.Cheers--Mayur (talk•Email) 10:58, 8 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Who gave Vibhi authority to take decision regarding this? This is completely obnoxious. Mayur, first delete this template ({{उत्तम लेख}}) as it's useless. Secondly, make all such templates— FA, GA, etc, fully protected. — Bill william comptonTalk 07:11, 4 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Yes.My bot was removing only uttam lekh category but template was later added by vibhijainbot which have this good article category.I shall remove it separately after making uttam lekh category empty. --Mayur (talk•Email) 06:31, 4 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
— Bill william comptonTalk 14:34, 5 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Formal complaint
[संपादित करें]Mayur, I'm filing a formal complaint against अनुनाद सिंह (वार्ता • योगदान). He broke the code of civility—one of Wikipedia's five pillars ("हर लेखक को अन्य लेखकों के साथ शिष्टता और आदर के साथ व्यवहार करना चाहिए।") by calling me with a profane name (डिलीट मास्टर). In whole discussion, I maintained a degree of courtesy and didn't use any offensive title against him. So, I kindly request you to take the necessary action as soon as possible, thanks and regards. — Bill william comptonTalk 13:49, 7 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- I have requested all at chaupal to follow विकिपीडिया:निजी टिप्पणियाँ एवं आक्षेप policy let hope such incident will not be repeated--Mayur (talk•Email) 15:15, 7 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
चित्रो के साथ क्या किया जाये
[संपादित करें]Hi,
I have uploaded few images in the past either taken from English Wikipedia or the ones which I took (e.g. चित्र:इंदौर का राजवाड़ा.jpg}
I do understand your concern about the license but can you please tell me what to do so that we don't run in to infringement.
Thanks, Manish
This page currently guides people to use arabic numerals. I thought consensus was either to the contrary(to use international numerals) or there was no consensus at all. Shouldn't we either correct it to say "use international numerals" or if there is no consensus, remove the guideline point atleast; since there is no point in saying either if we don't have consensus.--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 18:00, 9 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- There was consensus but some user didn't liked consensus method for this.So final conclusion was that it is up to any user who want to use either international or devanagari numeral.Yes I have removed this clause.Cheers--Mayur (talk•Email) 05:29, 10 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of साँचा:श्रेष्ठ लेख
[संपादित करें]A tag has been placed on साँचा:श्रेष्ठ लेख, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 10:34, 10 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 05:31, 11 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
New comment in the "Copying Within Wikipedia" discussion सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 16:18, 11 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I made विकिपीडिया:Articles for deletion to make it easy for users to see what is being discussed. Perhaps it will make more users take part in the discussions? --MGA73 (वार्ता) 22:24, 11 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Hehe ooops... See सदस्य_वार्ता:Siddhartha_Ghai#विकिपीडिया:Articles for deletion. --MGA73 (वार्ता) 22:50, 11 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
TW Troubles?
[संपादित करें]I see that you've been trying to fix TW. It seems to work fine for me. Having any particular problems?--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 10:37, 15 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- It is not working for me I thought you made some changes but it is not the reason.Which browser are you using? I have already filed a bug for this in bugzila as I thought it may due because of intersecting of new webfont script.--Mayur (talk•Email) 10:45, 15 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Using google chrome. BTW, TW doesn't work in IE 8.0 or below. If you're using chrome, try checking for any JS errors(maybe the resource failed to load). Also, could you give the bug id? Thanks.--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 11:11, 15 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, and do you always get the webfonts' फॉन्ट चयन करें even after login? Coz I get TW, but that webfonts option is missing.--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 11:14, 15 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33154 is the bug, I also tried crome but it is not working any where and after login i see no font option.--Mayur (talk•Email) 11:19, 15 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- So you're not getting either of the two? No TW and no webfonts? Try disabling TW from gadgets and see if webfonts comes back up again.--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 11:22, 15 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33154 is the bug, I also tried crome but it is not working any where and after login i see no font option.--Mayur (talk•Email) 11:19, 15 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Same here, I'm not able to use TW not even the basic Editing tools while editing. There is only option for switching to hindi or eng font. I'm on Firefox. आशूबातकरें 13:21, 15 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Ashu's right. The reftoolbar hasn't been loading for some time now. Maybe that too is coz of the webfonts.--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 14:08, 15 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, and do you always get the webfonts' फॉन्ट चयन करें even after login? Coz I get TW, but that webfonts option is missing.--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 11:14, 15 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Using google chrome. BTW, TW doesn't work in IE 8.0 or below. If you're using chrome, try checking for any JS errors(maybe the resource failed to load). Also, could you give the bug id? Thanks.--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 11:11, 15 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
One more thing, the article feedback options "Trustworthy", "Objective", "Complete", "Well-written" used to be in hindi, right? Now they're back in english.--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 14:08, 15 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Well atleast it's showing in your browser, I'm not ev1 able to rate pages since rating is not available in my browser from past few days. आशूबातकरें 17:06, 15 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- @Ashliveslove, Now it is clear that these all sudden problems is due to intersection of our twinkle and various other scripts with webfont script. Just comment here-https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33154 any problem you have.It is difficult for me too to work without twinkle but we should wait till this bug is resolved.For time being you can use Huggle to cover vandalism--Mayur (talk•Email) 18:33, 15 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Well atleast it's showing in your browser, I'm not ev1 able to rate pages since rating is not available in my browser from past few days. आशूबातकरें 17:06, 15 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
@Mayur: You said at the bug that translated translatewiki messages aren't working. I don't see that either, and I'm still getting the reftoolbar, as opposed to what ashu is seeing. Could you give an example where you don't see the translated messages?--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 19:12, 15 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- This problem is occurring in sa wiki as observed by hemant wikikosh.He informed the same problem to me on email. and here also as per your comment One more thing, the article feedback options "Trustworthy", "Objective", "Complete", "Well-written" used to be in hindi, right? Now they're back in english it seems that it is probably due to webfont.--Mayur (talk•Email) 05:04, 16 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Ohk. everything is back to normal now. I can use Twinkli, webfonts, and can even see the rating box in hindi too. आशूबातकरें 08:11, 16 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
Yup, and that's courtesy Krinkle, who took barely two minutes to find the cause of the problem once we told him about the problem itself. Hope fully twinkle should be fixed with webfonts for now.--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 09:23, 16 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
You are also welcome...
[संपादित करें]... to look at सदस्य:MGA73/Cleanup if you ever get some time you do not know what to do with - even if I did not invite you yesterday :-D Would be nice if days had 30 hours instead of 24... --MGA73 (वार्ता) 17:17, 21 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm, nice one but again problem is we have 24 hr rather than 30 hr however I shall also make a dip into this pond:-)--Mayur (talk•Email) 11:39, 23 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
सहायता
[संपादित करें]मयूर,
मै मराठी विकिपीडिया पे मेरा योगदान देता हूं। लेकीन वहा कुछ गॅजेट्स की कमी है जैसे की हॉट कॅट इ.। मै अभी स्क्रिप्ट इंपोर्ट करके हॉट कॅट चला रहा हूं। ट्विंकल टॅब भी मैने ऐसे ही अॅड किया है लेकीन उसका मेनू आता है लेकीन वो काम नही करता इसका हाल आप मुझे बता सकते है क्या?
नये गॅजेट्स कैसे अॅड करना यह भी बताने की कृपा करे और मै रोलबॅक का इस्तेमाल कर सकता हूं या नही यह भी बताने की कृपा करे (मैने पढा है की सिसॉप के अलावा अन्य सदस्यो को भी यह अधिकार दिया जा सकता है) आपसे पहली ही वार्ता मे आपसे बहुत से सवाल पूछे है लेकीन आप यह समझ सकते है।
अगर आप मेरे सवालो का हाल देना चाहते है तो यहा याने हिंदी विकिपीडिया पे ही मुझसे वार्ता करने का प्रयास करे। संतोष दहिवळ (वार्ता) 21:02, 24 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
hi, need help
[संपादित करें]Check the contributions of the user सदस्य:Dr. ashok shukla. He has created many articles regarding unremarkable person, other blog related articles with no references except that certain blog. I'm tired of deleting his articles since he goes on creating them again n again. See what you can do. Thanks. आशूबातकरें 13:52, 27 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Just cite him about our wiki policies and if he continue it you can give him final warning--Mayur (talk•Email) 19:13, 27 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Ashu, check few things with the articles before nominating them for deletion: subject of the article is notable enough, subject has been covered widely in the independent reliable sources, references are direct, and there's no defamation in biographical articles. If articles created by this user don't follow these mandatory elements then you should nominate them for deletion and give subsequent warnings to user on his talk page— Level 1, Level 2, Level 3 and Level 4, and if he doesn't stop after level 4 then he would be blocked from editing on Hindi Wikipedia with no further investigation and notifications. Also, report him only at the administrator notice board.
- Secondly, blog is considered reliable source of reference only in the case if it is authorized by the subject himself/herself; meaning, if person A has article on Wikipedia which already have [as said above] reliable and independent sources and if he/she runs a blog which contains personal information about him/her, like his/her marital status, age, sexual orientation, religion, education, occupation, and other personal figures and facts, then this blog can be used, in any other case blogs are not acceptable.<>< Bill william comptonTalk 19:19, 27 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with you bill, at first I was ignorant about him but then he started creating all sorts of articles regarding his blogs and even about the people writing those blogs. This include single lined biographical articles without any references about unremarkable persons. I've given him warnings too but he simply clears his talk page. Blogs with original research is not a reliable source and you can see how his blogs are written. All are from blogspot.com. He even created a whole template about such articles on wiki. I even tried to advice and warn him but user dnt even reply and is busy in this work all the time. आशूबातकरें 01:35, 28 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Then there's no need to wait—report him at the administrators' noticeboard.<>< Bill william comptonTalk 02:29, 28 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- I also observed that he is putting his signature in each article he edits. BTW I have given him our message in hindi we should try to convert new comers to established user--Mayur (talk•Email) 04:50, 28 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- Then there's no need to wait—report him at the administrators' noticeboard.<>< Bill william comptonTalk 02:29, 28 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with you bill, at first I was ignorant about him but then he started creating all sorts of articles regarding his blogs and even about the people writing those blogs. This include single lined biographical articles without any references about unremarkable persons. I've given him warnings too but he simply clears his talk page. Blogs with original research is not a reliable source and you can see how his blogs are written. All are from blogspot.com. He even created a whole template about such articles on wiki. I even tried to advice and warn him but user dnt even reply and is busy in this work all the time. आशूबातकरें 01:35, 28 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
तीर्थंकर
[संपादित करें]नमस्ते मयूरजी, मैं कुछ समय से जैन धर्म के तीर्थंकरों से सम्बन्धित लेखों पर कार्य कर रहा हूँ| कुछ विषयों पर आपका सहयोग चाहिए|
- कुछ तीर्थंकरों के नाम गलत हैं, कृपया इन लेखों के नाम को बदल दीजिए
- चंदाप्रभु जी- चन्द्रप्रभ जी; पदम प्रभु जी- पद्मप्रभ जी;
- सुपाश्वॅनाथ जी- सुपार्श्वनाथ जी; अभिनन्दन जी- अभिनन्दननाथ जी,
- कृपया इस लिंक पर देखिये(लिंक इंग्लिश में है, चूँकि नेट पर अन्य हिंदी स्रोत पर भी कुछ अशुद्धियाँ हैं, इस लिंक में भी कृपया दूसरी तालिका को देखें) [1]
- इसके अलावा इंग्लिश विकी पर भी नामों का मिलान किया जा सकता है|
- नौवें तीर्थंकर सुविधिनाथ जी, पुष्पदन्त जी के नाम से अधिक जाने जाते हैं, एवं इंग्लिश विकी पर भी पुष्पदन्त नाम से ही लेख है| लेख का नाम पुष्पदन्त रख कर सुविधिनाथ जी को इस लेख पर अनुप्रेषित किया जा सकता है|
- अरिष्टनेमि जी, बाईसवें तीर्थंकर नेमिनाथ जी का ही नाम है| कृपया अरिष्टनेमि जी के लेख को नेमिनाथ जी के लेख में अनुप्रेषित कर दीजिए|
- सभी तीर्थंकरों के नाम के आगे 'जी' को हटा दीजिए अन्यथा संभवनाथ और ऋषभदेव में 'जी' जोड़ दीजिए|
- नमिनाथ जी और नेमिनाथ जी दोनों अलग व्यक्ति/तीर्थंकर थे| फिलहाल 'नमिनाथ जी' को 'नेमिनाथ जी' के लेख में अनुप्रेषित किया हुआ है| कृपया नमिनाथ जी का लेख पृथक रूप से बना दें|
समय देने और आपके परिश्रम के लिए पूर्व में ही धन्यवाद...
Rahul07 (वार्ता) 20:14, 27 दिसम्बर 2011 (UTC)
- क्या आप बता सकते है कि यह सभी परिवर्तन आप हिन्दी विकि के किस पृष्ठ में चाहते है अथवा ऐसे समस्त पृष्ठों की सूची मुझे दें इन सब में यह परिवर्तन करने का प्रयास करुँगा। शुभकामनाएँ--Mayur (talk•Email) 12:52, 1 जनवरी 2012 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
In the sections:
चित्रों को हटाना
[संपादित करें]नमस्कार मयूर जी।
कृपया चित्रों को हटाते समय उनकी कड़ियाँ भी लेखों से हटा दिया कीजिये। धन्यवाद--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 22:47, 24 अप्रैल 2012 (UTC)
निर्वाचित सूची नामांकन
[संपादित करें]मयूर, मैने इंडियाना राज्य प्रतीकों की सूची को निर्वाचित सूची के लिए नामित किया है। अपना अमूल्य समय देकर कृपया इस नामांकन में टिप्पणियाँ करें, ध्न्यवाद। नामांकन पृष्ठ।<>< Bill william comptonTalk 05:34, 27 अप्रैल 2012 (UTC)
नामांकन
[संपादित करें]मयूर जी,नमस्कार
मैंने स्वयं को हिन्दी विकिपीडिया के प्रबन्धक अधिकार हेतु नामांकित किया है। आप से निवेदन है कि विकिपीडिया पर आकर अपना मत दे। यदि आपको मुझ मैं कोई कमी लगे तो ईमेल से भी बता सकते है। उस कमी को दुर करने का मैं पुर्ण प्रयत्न करुगा। धन्यवाद
आनन्द विवेक सतपथी सन्देश 10:17, 3 मई 2012 (UTC)
कृपया टिप्पणी करें
[संपादित करें]मयूर, कृपया यहाँ अपनी राय दें। हिन्दी विकिपीडिया पे कोई भी निर्वाचित विषयवस्तुओं पे ध्यान ही नहीं देता, ऐसे में मेरे नामांकन भी अटके रहते हैं।<>< Bill william comptonTalk 03:13, 5 मई 2012 (UTC)
विशेष पृष्ठ अनुवाद
[संपादित करें]नमस्कार मयूर जी।
ट्रांसलेटविकि पर विशेष पृष्ठों के नामों के अनुवाद की सुविधा प्रदान की गई है। परंतु अब तक हिन्दी में अनुवाद नहीं किये गए हैं। चूँकि ये अनुवाद सभी सदस्यों के लिये समान हैं, अतः ट्रांसलेटविकि के प्रबंधकों के अनुसार ये अनुवाद सर्वसम्मति से किये जाने चाहियें। अतः मैंने इनके अनुवाद का प्रस्ताव विकिपीडिया:चौपाल/विशेष पृष्ठ अनुवाद पर रखा है। कृपया इसपर टिप्पणी अवश्य दें। यदि आपको इन अनुवादों में कोई कमी नज़र आए तो अवश्य बताएँ, और इन्हें सही कराने के पश्चात अपना समर्थन प्रदान करें ताकि ये अनुवाद लागू किये जा सकें और अंग्रेज़ी नामों की अनिवार्यता पर रोक लगाई जा सके। सदैव आभारी--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 16:44, 6 मई 2012 (UTC)
नमस्कार मयूर जी।
अनेक सदस्यों की सहायता से अनुवाद पूर्ण हो गए हैं। अतः इन अनुवादों की समीक्षा करने हेतु (कि ये सर्वसम्मति प्राप्त करते हैं या नहीं) विकिपीडिया:चौपाल/विशेष_पृष्ठ_अनुवाद#मत पर मत रखा गया है। कृपया इसमें अपने विचार व्यक्त करें। कोई आपत्ति हो तो अवश्य व्यक्त करें। धन्यवाद--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 11:49, 13 मई 2012 (UTC)
नमस्कार मयूर जी। समुदाय की सहायता से मुख्य रूप से अनुवाद का कार्य पूर्ण हो गया है, केवल कुछ ही अनुवाद रहते हैं। कृपया इनपर चर्चा में भाग लें और विकिपीडिया:चौपाल/विशेष पृष्ठ अनुवाद#बाकी_अनुवादों_पर_चर्चा पर अपनी टिप्पणी दें। धन्यवाद--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 22:11, 20 मई 2012 (UTC)
सन्देश
[संपादित करें]आप इस सूचना को किसी भी समय मिटा सकते है, इसके लिए वार्ता संपादन में जाकर {{सन्देश}} मिटाएँ।
सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 18:22, 6 मई 2012 (UTC)
Non licensed images
[संपादित करें]Please note that whenever you delete non licensed images, make sure that they're not being used. If they are, then please either replace them with equivalents from commons, or unlink them (Twinkle unlinking doesn't work half the time, you'll have to do it manually).
If whoever is deleting doesn't do this, it just leaves a mess for others to clear up. Regards--सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 20:32, 17 मई 2012 (UTC)
देखें और करें
[संपादित करें]इसको कपी कर नयाँ गैजेट जोडें जिससे मेरी वार्ता और मेरी वरियताएँ के बीच में मेरा प्रयोगपृष्ठ दिखेगा और संबंधित सदस्य का अपना प्रयोगपृष्ठ स्वतः(automatic) बनेगा।-भवानी गौतम (वार्ता) 02:40, 31 मई 2012 (UTC)
आपके लिये एक सम्मान
[संपादित करें]सज्जनता बार्नस्टार | |
मुझे विकिपीडिया पर योगदान देने के लिए प्रोत्साहित करने के लिए शुक्रिया AJ™(वार्ता•ई-मेल) 07:26, 26 नवम्बर 2012 (UTC) |
आशीष भटनागर के नाम का प्रस्ताव
[संपादित करें]मयूर जी! कृपया ध्यान दें: प्रशासक पद के लिये जिस सदस्य को नामित किया जा रहा है, उसे यह प्रस्ताव स्वीकार होना जरूरी है। अतः यदि आप किसी को प्रशासक पद के लिये नामित करते हैं तो सम्बन्धित सदस्य के वार्ता पृष्ट पर उनके लिये भी संदेश लिख दीजिये और उनसे आग्रह कीजिये कि यदि वे इस प्रस्ताव से सहमत हैं तो इस पृष्ठ पर अपनी सहमति प्रकट करें। डॉ०'क्रान्त'एम०एल०वर्मा (वार्ता) 05:00, 11 अगस्त 2013 (UTC))
- क्रान्त जी नमस्कार, आशीष जी ने अपनी स्वकृति दे दी है, धन्यवाद--Mayur (talk•Email) 21:57, 12 अगस्त 2013 (UTC)
एण्ड्रायड एप्लिकेशन की आवश्यकता
[संपादित करें]हिन्दी विकि के लिये अलग से एक एण्ड्रायड एप्लिकेशन की आवश्यकता है। एण्ड्रायड फोन आज के समय में भारत के गांव-गांव पहुंच चुके हैं। एण्ड्रायड गूगल हिन्दी इनपुट भी काफी अच्छा है। मुझे विश्वास है कि इस कदम से लाखों लोग हिन्दी विकि से जुड़ सकेंगे। धन्यवाद। --Manojkhurana (वार्ता) 12:17, 21 अगस्त 2013 (UTC)
हिंदी दिवस सम्मान
[संपादित करें]अशोक चक्र | |
हिंदी दिवस के उपलक्ष्य में एक हिंदी प्रेमी की ओर से- हिंदी विकिपीडिया में उल्लेखनीय योगदान के लिए विशेष सम्मान। मनोज खुराना (वार्ता) 05:20, 14 सितंबर 2013 (UTC) |
चित्र:Gobidesert.jpg पृष्ठ को शीघ्र हटाने का नामांकन
[संपादित करें]नमस्कार, आपके द्वारा बनाए पृष्ठ चित्र:Gobidesert.jpg को विकिपीडिया पर पृष्ठ हटाने की नीति के मापदंड फ़1 के अंतर्गत शीघ्र हटाने के लिये नामांकित किया गया है।
इसमें वे सभी फाइलें आती हैं जिनमें अपलोड होने से दो सप्ताह के बाद तक भी कोई लाइसेंस नहीं दिया गया है। ऐसा होने पर यदि फ़ाइल पुरानी होने के कारण सार्वजनिक क्षेत्र(पब्लिक डोमेन) में नहीं होगी, तो उसे शीघ्र हटा दिया जाएगा।
ध्यान रखें कि विकिपीडिया पर केवल मुक्त फ़ाइलें ही रखी जा सकती हैं। यह फ़ाइल तभी रखी जा सकती है यदि इसका कॉपीराइट धारक इसे किसी मुक्त लाइसेंस के अंतर्गत विमोचित करे। यदि ऐसा न हो तो इसे विकिपीडिया पर नहीं रखा जा सकता। यदि इस फ़ाइल के कॉपीराइट की जानकारी आपको नहीं है तो आप चौपाल पर सहायता माँग सकते हैं। सहायता माँगते समय कृपया इसका स्रोत (जहाँ से आपको यह फ़ाइल मिली) अवश्य बताएँ। यदि आपको इसके कॉपीराइट की जानकारी है तो कृपया श्रेणी:कॉपीराइट साँचे में से कोई उपयुक्त साँचा फ़ाइल पर लगा दें।
यदि यह पृष्ठ अभी हटाया नहीं गया है तो आप पृष्ठ में सुधार कर सकते हैं ताकि वह विकिपीडिया की नीतियों पर खरा उतरे। यदि आपको लगता है कि यह पृष्ठ इस मापदंड के अंतर्गत नहीं आता है तो आप पृष्ठ पर जाकर नामांकन टैग पर दिये हुए बटन पर क्लिक कर के इस नामांकन के विरोध का कारण बता सकते हैं। कृपया ध्यान रखें कि शीघ्र हटाने के नामांकन के पश्चात यदि पृष्ठ नीति अनुसार शीघ्र हटाने योग्य पाया जाता है तो उसे कभी भी हटाया जा सकता है।
सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 15:02, 17 फ़रवरी 2014 (UTC)
विकिपीडिया:नीति पुनरीक्षण पृष्ठ का हटाने हेतु चर्चा के लिये नामांकन
[संपादित करें]नमस्कार, विकिपीडिया:नीति पुनरीक्षण को विकिपीडिया पर पृष्ठ हटाने की नीति के अंतर्गत हटाने हेतु चर्चा के लिये नामांकित किया गया है। इस बारे में चर्चा विकिपीडिया:पृष्ठ हटाने हेतु चर्चा/अन्य/विकिपीडिया:नीति पुनरीक्षण पर हो रही है। इस चर्चा में भाग लेने के लिये आपका स्वागत है।
नामांकनकर्ता ने नामांकन करते समय निम्न कारण प्रदान किया है:
कृपया इस नामांकन का उत्तर चर्चा पृष्ठ पर ही दें।
चर्चा के दौरान आप पृष्ठ में सुधार कर सकते हैं ताकि वह विकिपीडिया की नीतियों पर खरा उतरे। परंतु जब तक चर्चा जारी है, कृपया पृष्ठ से नामांकन साँचा ना हटाएँ।सिद्धार्थ घई (वार्ता) 13:21, 16 मार्च 2014 (UTC)