"सामाजिक स्वामित्व": अवतरणों में अंतर
Content deleted Content added
Sections टैग: मोबाइल संपादन मोबाइल वेब संपादन |
Sanjeev bot (वार्ता | योगदान) छो बॉट: साँचा हटा रहा है: काम जारी |
||
पंक्ति 1: | पंक्ति 1: | ||
{{काम जारी|date=नवम्बर 2016}} |
|||
'''सामाजिक स्वामित्व''' का सन्दर्भ [[समाजवादी]] आर्थिक प्रणालियों में [[उत्पादन के साधन|उत्पादन के साधनों]] के लिए स्वामित्व के विभिन्न प्रकारों से हैं; इस में [[सार्वजनिक स्वामित्व]], [[कर्मचारी स्वामित्व]], [[सहकारी|सहकारी स्वामित्व]], इक्विटी का नागरिक स्वामित्व,<ref>{{cite book |last=O'Hara |first=Phillip |title=Encyclopedia of Political Economy, Volume 2 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |date=September 2003 |isbn=0-415-24187-1 |page=71 |quote=In order of increasing decentralisation (at least) three forms of socialised ownership can be distinguished: state-owned firms, employee-owned (or socially) owned firms, and citizen ownership of equity.}}</ref> और [[आम स्वामित्व]]<ref name="The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought">{{cite book |last=Hastings, Mason and Pyper |first=Adrian, Alistair and Hugh |title=The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=December 21, 2000 |isbn=978-0-19-860024-4 |page=677 |quote=Socialists have always recognized that there are many possible forms of social ownership of which co-operative ownership is one. Nationalization in itself has nothing particularly to do with socialism and has existed under non-socialist and anti-socialist regimes. Kautsky in 1891 pointed out that a ‘co-operative commonwealth’ could not be the result of the ‘general nationalization of all industries’ unless there was a change in ‘the character of the state’.}}</ref> शामिल हैं। |
'''सामाजिक स्वामित्व''' का सन्दर्भ [[समाजवादी]] आर्थिक प्रणालियों में [[उत्पादन के साधन|उत्पादन के साधनों]] के लिए स्वामित्व के विभिन्न प्रकारों से हैं; इस में [[सार्वजनिक स्वामित्व]], [[कर्मचारी स्वामित्व]], [[सहकारी|सहकारी स्वामित्व]], इक्विटी का नागरिक स्वामित्व,<ref>{{cite book |last=O'Hara |first=Phillip |title=Encyclopedia of Political Economy, Volume 2 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |date=September 2003 |isbn=0-415-24187-1 |page=71 |quote=In order of increasing decentralisation (at least) three forms of socialised ownership can be distinguished: state-owned firms, employee-owned (or socially) owned firms, and citizen ownership of equity.}}</ref> और [[आम स्वामित्व]]<ref name="The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought">{{cite book |last=Hastings, Mason and Pyper |first=Adrian, Alistair and Hugh |title=The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=December 21, 2000 |isbn=978-0-19-860024-4 |page=677 |quote=Socialists have always recognized that there are many possible forms of social ownership of which co-operative ownership is one. Nationalization in itself has nothing particularly to do with socialism and has existed under non-socialist and anti-socialist regimes. Kautsky in 1891 pointed out that a ‘co-operative commonwealth’ could not be the result of the ‘general nationalization of all industries’ unless there was a change in ‘the character of the state’.}}</ref> शामिल हैं। |
||
17:15, 8 फ़रवरी 2017 का अवतरण
सामाजिक स्वामित्व का सन्दर्भ समाजवादी आर्थिक प्रणालियों में उत्पादन के साधनों के लिए स्वामित्व के विभिन्न प्रकारों से हैं; इस में सार्वजनिक स्वामित्व, कर्मचारी स्वामित्व, सहकारी स्वामित्व, इक्विटी का नागरिक स्वामित्व,[1] और आम स्वामित्व[2] शामिल हैं।
शब्द का दुरुपयोग
सन्दर्भ
- ↑ O'Hara, Phillip (September 2003). Encyclopedia of Political Economy, Volume 2. Routledge. पृ॰ 71. आई॰ऍस॰बी॰ऍन॰ 0-415-24187-1.
In order of increasing decentralisation (at least) three forms of socialised ownership can be distinguished: state-owned firms, employee-owned (or socially) owned firms, and citizen ownership of equity.
- ↑ Hastings, Mason and Pyper, Adrian, Alistair and Hugh (December 21, 2000). The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought. Oxford University Press. पृ॰ 677. आई॰ऍस॰बी॰ऍन॰ 978-0-19-860024-4.
Socialists have always recognized that there are many possible forms of social ownership of which co-operative ownership is one. Nationalization in itself has nothing particularly to do with socialism and has existed under non-socialist and anti-socialist regimes. Kautsky in 1891 pointed out that a ‘co-operative commonwealth’ could not be the result of the ‘general nationalization of all industries’ unless there was a change in ‘the character of the state’.