"सामाजिक स्वामित्व": अवतरणों में अंतर

मुक्त ज्ञानकोश विकिपीडिया से
Sections
टैग: मोबाइल संपादन मोबाइल वेब संपादन
छो बॉट: साँचा हटा रहा है: काम जारी
पंक्ति 1: पंक्ति 1:

{{काम जारी|date=नवम्बर 2016}}
'''सामाजिक स्वामित्व''' का सन्दर्भ [[समाजवादी]] आर्थिक प्रणालियों में [[उत्पादन के साधन|उत्पादन के साधनों]] के लिए स्वामित्व के विभिन्न प्रकारों से हैं; इस में [[सार्वजनिक स्वामित्व]], [[कर्मचारी स्वामित्व]], [[सहकारी|सहकारी स्वामित्व]], इक्विटी का नागरिक स्वामित्व,<ref>{{cite book |last=O'Hara |first=Phillip |title=Encyclopedia of Political Economy, Volume 2 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |date=September 2003 |isbn=0-415-24187-1 |page=71 |quote=In order of increasing decentralisation (at least) three forms of socialised ownership can be distinguished: state-owned firms, employee-owned (or socially) owned firms, and citizen ownership of equity.}}</ref> और [[आम स्वामित्व]]<ref name="The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought">{{cite book |last=Hastings, Mason and Pyper |first=Adrian, Alistair and Hugh |title=The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=December 21, 2000 |isbn=978-0-19-860024-4 |page=677 |quote=Socialists have always recognized that there are many possible forms of social ownership of which co-operative ownership is one. Nationalization in itself has nothing particularly to do with socialism and has existed under non-socialist and anti-socialist regimes. Kautsky in 1891 pointed out that a ‘co-operative commonwealth’ could not be the result of the ‘general nationalization of all industries’ unless there was a change in ‘the character of the state’.}}</ref> शामिल हैं।
'''सामाजिक स्वामित्व''' का सन्दर्भ [[समाजवादी]] आर्थिक प्रणालियों में [[उत्पादन के साधन|उत्पादन के साधनों]] के लिए स्वामित्व के विभिन्न प्रकारों से हैं; इस में [[सार्वजनिक स्वामित्व]], [[कर्मचारी स्वामित्व]], [[सहकारी|सहकारी स्वामित्व]], इक्विटी का नागरिक स्वामित्व,<ref>{{cite book |last=O'Hara |first=Phillip |title=Encyclopedia of Political Economy, Volume 2 |publisher=[[Routledge]] |date=September 2003 |isbn=0-415-24187-1 |page=71 |quote=In order of increasing decentralisation (at least) three forms of socialised ownership can be distinguished: state-owned firms, employee-owned (or socially) owned firms, and citizen ownership of equity.}}</ref> और [[आम स्वामित्व]]<ref name="The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought">{{cite book |last=Hastings, Mason and Pyper |first=Adrian, Alistair and Hugh |title=The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought |publisher=Oxford University Press |date=December 21, 2000 |isbn=978-0-19-860024-4 |page=677 |quote=Socialists have always recognized that there are many possible forms of social ownership of which co-operative ownership is one. Nationalization in itself has nothing particularly to do with socialism and has existed under non-socialist and anti-socialist regimes. Kautsky in 1891 pointed out that a ‘co-operative commonwealth’ could not be the result of the ‘general nationalization of all industries’ unless there was a change in ‘the character of the state’.}}</ref> शामिल हैं।



17:15, 8 फ़रवरी 2017 का अवतरण

सामाजिक स्वामित्व का सन्दर्भ समाजवादी आर्थिक प्रणालियों में उत्पादन के साधनों के लिए स्वामित्व के विभिन्न प्रकारों से हैं; इस में सार्वजनिक स्वामित्व, कर्मचारी स्वामित्व, सहकारी स्वामित्व, इक्विटी का नागरिक स्वामित्व,[1] और आम स्वामित्व[2] शामिल हैं।

शब्द का दुरुपयोग

सन्दर्भ

  1. O'Hara, Phillip (September 2003). Encyclopedia of Political Economy, Volume 2. Routledge. पृ॰ 71. आई॰ऍस॰बी॰ऍन॰ 0-415-24187-1. In order of increasing decentralisation (at least) three forms of socialised ownership can be distinguished: state-owned firms, employee-owned (or socially) owned firms, and citizen ownership of equity.
  2. Hastings, Mason and Pyper, Adrian, Alistair and Hugh (December 21, 2000). The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought. Oxford University Press. पृ॰ 677. आई॰ऍस॰बी॰ऍन॰ 978-0-19-860024-4. Socialists have always recognized that there are many possible forms of social ownership of which co-operative ownership is one. Nationalization in itself has nothing particularly to do with socialism and has existed under non-socialist and anti-socialist regimes. Kautsky in 1891 pointed out that a ‘co-operative commonwealth’ could not be the result of the ‘general nationalization of all industries’ unless there was a change in ‘the character of the state’.

बाहरी कड़ियाँ